Hey everyone!
I can’t be the only one who is not impressed with the results of “Dragon Year” contest results, am I?
Not to say anything bad about the designs that were chosen as top 3 and then the next 15 for great entry. However, from 1000 entries, I could find tons of better designs based on anything starting from engagement, model difficulty and also how good the photos/descriptions and overall presentation of the design was made.
For example, the third place winner. sorry but what made it better than the 15 “exceptional entry” designs? It was not more complex than the 15 designs bellow it. It had less engagement than half of the designs from the 15 bellow it. and it’s just a rectangle with text on it.
What I am saying. it would be great that MakerWorld would be transparent and let the community know how these designs are evaluated, because just looking at them, the 3rd place winner is definitely not even to be considered in top 20 (my opinion of course). There are many designs that were left out of top 18 that were better than the 3rd place winner. Again, that’s just my opinion, but I don’t believe that I am the only one who thinks so.
Hoping to explanation how the winners are chosen for the future contests.
Best reagrds,
3DBrinumi
14 posts - 9 participants