I received a one star rating of one of my models, which was also popular with this comment:
I would like to ask @Makerworld to implement a more objective and regular evaluation system, otherwise you will be damaged by extremely incorrect evaluations due to incompetence and because many users do not even understand what they are evaluating, this is to the detriment of the makers.
Before giving a 1 or 2 or 3 star evaluation, in addition to an accurate description (So the comment must be structured with a minimum number of characters), I would also make it mandatory to insert the image of the problem, that is, force you to insert a photo in the evaluations from 1 to 3 stars.
The comment above is really absurd, among other things the print profile was created with generic pla filament.
You can not receive one star evaluations with comments like that with the user who does not even understand that the filament parameters are either generic or if it is a particular brand of filament that needs calibration, this depends on the user himself.
It is not even fair that the author has to report incorrect evaluations and motivations, which sometimes are not even taken into consideration (I have an evaluation reported 3 times and never considered on "detachment from the plate).
When will these implementations be implemented to protect makers but also users who can justify an actual defect in the print profile??
10 posts - 4 participants